libdhcp_ddns_tuning.so is available as a premium hook library from ISC
https://kea.readthedocs.io/en/latest/arm/hooks.html#hooks-ddns-tuning
- Feed Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Feed Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
All Stories
Jul 15 2024
Moin,
i currently bit on this in 1.4.0; The issue is that, ideally LE reissuance should be automated in the background. One can, of course, add a ca statement. However, that statement is single-valued, i.e., if a reissuance due to the cycling of intermediates (see: https://letsencrypt.org/certificates/) ends up with another intermediate, configuration breaks.
Imho, this should be reflected in the documentation, at least; Ideally with an example for how to import the most recent ACME intermediates.
This PR missed another location to add --no-healthcheck.
Hi, I’d be happy to take this on.
Jul 14 2024
pre-auth stage of the negotiation does not populate the Device, IPv4, _TX, and _RX values yet, that's why the command fails: the raw array doesn't contain these variables yet.
Jul 13 2024
In T4078#170371, @dmbaturin wrote:I suppose with the new firewall implementation, this is no longer relevant.
I've tested in the new version , the problem with default net30 , it is already there .however , when the new version started show a warning message that migrating from net30 to subnet because is going to be deprecated :
In T5797#195193, @marekm wrote:Hmmm... nothing before today in this task seems related to ddclient at all, isn't this task referenced by mistake?
BTW, does anyone know what happened that Debian un-released ddcilent 3.10.0-3 (reverted to 3.10.0-2.1)?
Jul 12 2024
Hmmm... nothing before today in this task seems related to ddclient at all, isn't this task referenced by mistake?
BTW, does anyone know what happened that Debian un-released ddcilent 3.10.0-3 (reverted to 3.10.0-2.1)?
This was completed at the time of T5248.
@Viacheslav, Thank you for the hint. After further analysis, these are the findings from the tests done in the lab running 1.4.0 version on both sides with server/client setup.
@fernando Any idea for CLI?
Jul 11 2024
The solution sketched above will be handled in subtask T6569; in this task we will revert to using only the local redundancy removal in order to provide per-script error reporting.