show interfaces wireguard wgN
This just shows general configuration info & link state.
Pull Request to clarify group names must be unique.
I made a test lab at home for this, so let me know if you have any other settings or anything you need documentation for.
1.2 is not affected which runs OpenSSH_6.7p1 Debian-5+deb8u8, OpenSSL 1.0.1t 3 May 2016
Well, shame on you in that case ;0)
@phillipmcmahon I only implemented it as of yesterday ....
Well, shame on me for not trying. Appreciate you checking that on my behalf.
set interfaces ethernet ethß dhcp-options vendor-class-id "bar fooo vyos" is what you get 😄
@cpo cumulus behave differently cause they use an other implementation as in pure frr. They use PTMD see https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/cumulus-linux/Layer-3/Bidirectional-Forwarding-Detection-BFD/ and https://github.com/CumulusNetworks/ptm
@c-po wrote:
I would not backport it. Its a proof of concept and things are still unclear about peer configuration (why does cumulus FRR behave differently and has no peer config) also the FRR interface is only a PoC.
Can we just remove the deprecated options from being generated? They only leave a few lines in syslog, but these options are deprecated already in stretch.
(https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.5 ff)
I'm somewhat agnostic to the implementation method. Whether as raw options or explicitly supported options handled natively in the CLI. Both work for me.
@phillipmcmahon personally I'm not a fan of general raw option passing as we have in other places like OpenVPN oder DHCP server.
BGP scan-time parameter is unneeded in current FRRouting and VyOS - there are used modern next-hop tracking instead. You must avoid using this option. I have prepared PR to delete this option and migrate the old configuration, where it exists:
https://github.com/vyos/vyatta-cfg-quagga/pull/36
https://github.com/vyos/vyos-1x/pull/145
I see in v1.2.3 that the option to supply client-id and hostname exists which is great. My ISP requires the sending of DHCP Option 60 (VCI) in order to correctly get a lease. In EdgeOS it ends up looking like the following
@trae32566 definately! As Arista is gaining more food in the marked please share it here so we can then add it to our documentation.
I have a VyOS <-> Arista configuration, which should be similar to Cisco, if that works for y'all?
I would not backport it. Its a proof of concept and things are still unclear about peer configuration (why does cumulus FRR behave differently and has no peer config) also the FRR interface is only a PoC.
Yes I'm currently utilizing the rolling releases in service after basic functionality testing, and so far BFD has worked flawlessly for all protocols I've tested.
Hi @albeu thank you for this contribution. While reviewing it I found one flaw:
New Kernel Pipelines are at https://github.com/vyos/vyos-build-kernel
Any reason extcommunity-list and community-list doesnt support the same naming scheme?
Hi trae32566